Recent Posts
|
|
Will the Apple iPad Transform Schools?
by Andy Zucker on March 15 |
|
|
Duncan’s Message for Year 2: Move Out of Your Comfort Zone
by Nancy Walser on March 1 |
|
|
How Gender’s Got Us All Tied Up
by Gretchen Brion-Meisels on February 8 |
|
|
Another Missed Opportunity for Reform?
by Kavitha Mediratta on January 19 |
|
|
Looking Back, Looking Forward
by Nancy Walser on January 7 |
More from Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Coming Soon: AP: A Critical Examination of the Advanced Placement Program
- New Release: What Next? Educational Innovation and Philadelphia’s School of the Future
- New Release: Teaching Talent
- New Release: Against the Odds
- Four Central Dilemmas of Struggling Schools
- Online Testing, Version 1.0
- Beyond Gay-Straight Alliances
Creativity in Crisis: The “Brain Drain” in American Schools
by Michael Bitz on May 19, 2009
One often hears from the business world: “Jobs are going overseas, but America will stay strong because of its intellectual capital—its creative spirit.” This is a strange remark given that we so rarely ask our students to think creatively.
Of course, now we have to define “creativity,” a charged term that could easily be diffused by agreeing that “creativity” can mean different things to different people. Given that, creativity—in anybody’s definition—cannot possibly entail any of the following: washing your socks, feeding the kids, updating a database, sitting in traffic, watching TV, or going to sleep. Perhaps you recently saw a movie or attended a concert. Perhaps it was a classical chamber music concert—certainly that must entail creativity, with the bowties and high heels after all. But no, at best you were celebrating creativity, or truly appreciating creativity by knowing every nuance of the piece. But you yourself were not being creative. Maybe you clapped creatively for the encore.
Most adults, with our increasingly hectic schedules, assume that at least creativity is alive in our children when we send them off to drawing class or bassoon lessons. Yet most children’s time in the arts is spent either appreciating someone else’s art or learning the skill required to make the art, so that perhaps in the future one could be creative. This training sometimes leads to amazing technical skill. I have met more than a few children who can perfectly recreate a Dragonball-Z character or still-life bowl of fruit, but who struggle so to create an original character, story, technique, or idea.
So what is creativity? Many will argue about semantics and definitions. I will not enter that fray. Whatever it is, creativity revolves around unique, independent, and original thinking. It sometimes leads to an activity, such as playing the violin or implementing a new program to end homelessness. But without creative thought, the activity simply cannot be creative. In the end, only you can say whether you have been creative—only you can know whether your thoughts are unique, independent, original. So when was the last time you were creative? The answer for many Americans children is “never.”
This “brain drain” in our schools is reversible and could be halted without a single extra dollar in funding. Creativity requires teachers and students to put aside the textbooks and prescribed curricula and authentically engage children in learning. For example, perhaps the classroom forms a comic book company. Students write and publish original comics (literacy skills, check); focus the stories on historical events and leaders (social studies skills, check); develop a business plan with financial forecasts (math skills, check); and bring their product to the community through exhibits and presentations (civic engagement, check). Yes, it takes more time for educators to plan, coordinate, and implement creativity-based projects such as this, but the academic and social rewards are well worth the effort.
Of course, now we have to define “creativity,” a charged term that could easily be diffused by agreeing that “creativity” can mean different things to different people. Given that, creativity—in anybody’s definition—cannot possibly entail any of the following: washing your socks, feeding the kids, updating a database, sitting in traffic, watching TV, or going to sleep. Perhaps you recently saw a movie or attended a concert. Perhaps it was a classical chamber music concert—certainly that must entail creativity, with the bowties and high heels after all. But no, at best you were celebrating creativity, or truly appreciating creativity by knowing every nuance of the piece. But you yourself were not being creative. Maybe you clapped creatively for the encore.
Most adults, with our increasingly hectic schedules, assume that at least creativity is alive in our children when we send them off to drawing class or bassoon lessons. Yet most children’s time in the arts is spent either appreciating someone else’s art or learning the skill required to make the art, so that perhaps in the future one could be creative. This training sometimes leads to amazing technical skill. I have met more than a few children who can perfectly recreate a Dragonball-Z character or still-life bowl of fruit, but who struggle so to create an original character, story, technique, or idea.
So what is creativity? Many will argue about semantics and definitions. I will not enter that fray. Whatever it is, creativity revolves around unique, independent, and original thinking. It sometimes leads to an activity, such as playing the violin or implementing a new program to end homelessness. But without creative thought, the activity simply cannot be creative. In the end, only you can say whether you have been creative—only you can know whether your thoughts are unique, independent, original. So when was the last time you were creative? The answer for many Americans children is “never.”
This “brain drain” in our schools is reversible and could be halted without a single extra dollar in funding. Creativity requires teachers and students to put aside the textbooks and prescribed curricula and authentically engage children in learning. For example, perhaps the classroom forms a comic book company. Students write and publish original comics (literacy skills, check); focus the stories on historical events and leaders (social studies skills, check); develop a business plan with financial forecasts (math skills, check); and bring their product to the community through exhibits and presentations (civic engagement, check). Yes, it takes more time for educators to plan, coordinate, and implement creativity-based projects such as this, but the academic and social rewards are well worth the effort.
Comments:
| May 20, 2009 06:43 PM |
Schools in my opinion are projection of societies in miniature forms. I mean, in schools as well as in societies there are rules and regulations the learners must abide by. Yet, generally these rules are codified to curb people's natural instincts and desires. The outcome of these rules and regulations is to format the brain of each learner according to social expectations: being a conventional human being; a clone or even a replica of an ordinary creature. In so doing, learners renounce to their own selves and judge themselves in comparison to others. In so doing, their natural capacities dim down towards extinction. Creativity stems from instinct and rarely from logic. Indeed, logic is a conventional system of rationality whereas instinct is the seat of creation and originality. Every person being a specific human being has consequently personal talents which unfortunately can be stifled if they are obliged to tally with a collective code of life. In my opinion, this explains the reason why, Albert Einstein who grew into a genuis, was reported as a bad learner. Today, with the world entering the informational age, there is hope that creativity will be revived among learners since a computer can give them a sense of total freedom of expression without any conventional limits.
– Souleymane SAKHO |
| May 21, 2009 01:58 PM |
Dr. Bitz your comments are almost cruel.
My (public) Georgia High School Juniors have just completed their High School Graduation Tests (multiple guess) and End of Course Tests (another multiple guess test). Teachers are required to spend weeks teaching the tests and standardized testing strategies. Our success is measured by our pass/fail rates on the aforementioned assessments. We have precious little time for field trips or extended class projects because all curriculum must be covered by the time standardized tests are administered. Alas, I am in the belly of the beast. But for my own daughter there is hope -- she attends a private Montessori School. – Josephine |
| May 22, 2009 01:35 PM |
Josephine: Believe me, I am not blaming you or any other teacher. Putting aside textbooks and, worse, test prep requires a change in philosophy on the part of school, community, state, and federal leadership. I hope we are moving in that direction...MB
– Michael Bitz |
| May 25, 2009 05:15 PM |
I have taught in public schools for over 12 years. The last two of those years I spent at a school, which I found to be poorly managed and the school culture has been, at least to me, toxic. If you were 'different,' taught differently, were creative with your students, which was something I always strive to do and be, you were ridiculed, bullied, gossiped about, and basically excluded from friendships and the school "culture." Many parents basically 'ran' the school. Parents wrote grants and then teachers were expected to see that the programs these programs, written and 'created' by parents, were implemented by teachers, without their consent.
Last year, most specifically, I taught gifted and talented students. I had fun with the children creating all kinds of ways for the students to demonstrate their acquisition of knowledge. Not all tests were the paper and pencil type. Students made games to show mastery of concepts such as time, my students also made their own books to show acquisition of writing skills and parents came in and volunteered to bind books with the binding machine I had purchased several years ago. This was not a new practice for me, however, I found more students using the 'publishing services' more frequently. I found that I had more problems than ever though with these parents than I've ever experienced throughout 12 years cumulative! They thought I wasn't teaching enough language skills, however I made it abundantly clear they were acquiring them through the use of The Writer's Workshop. Instead of using a traditional Basal Reading Program, I used a research based Reader's Workshop program which allowed students to read books that interested them that were on their instructional reading level and that was a problem too! I found that whenever and wherever I tried to be creative, I found parents complaining to administration that I wasn't doing my job! I am now actually leaving that school to become a Facilitator for Title I schools because others have found that my skills are useful and see the benefit in them. Why the discrenpency?? – unidentified |
| Oct 13, 2009 03:24 PM |
I find it sad that teachers who have a creative spirit,become stifled by people who believe that just because they went through an educational system, that they know what education is and how deliver it. Creativity is what made us progress from colonial settlements, to a nation that went through the Industrial Revolution and have continued into the Info Revolution. What worked for students 20 years ago, doesn't necessarily work for them today. As a 35 year veteran, I have watched my adolescent students change in what interests them in topic and delivery, and today, students are not willing, nor should they have to, sit while a teacher delivers information in a variety of formats. Students need to become involved with their whole selves. Each student has strengths that need to be utilized for their individual learning. Education has spent too much time worrying about strengthening a student's weaknesses, but it is often to the detriment to their strengths. We need to make a change and focus on the positive aspects of each students capabilities. I have just thrown out the curriculum for my US History class, and have begun to implement a new format. Using a business model, these students first took a survey to find out their strengths within Gardner's multiple intelligences. After a discussion, we started to create a business, with a goal that they would produce a product as a model of learning with the 21st Century Skills, through the vehicle of US History. Students will pick topics that they choose to investigate, form a small working group through an application process, identifying each other's strengths and then will go about formulating the elements of the production of a unit. Each unit must have a variety of ways of learning to address multiple learning styles. Following guidelines and parameters of rigor, overall coverage and diversity, the students plan on creating their own US History curriculum.
For the last 9 years, my students have produced an Academic Fair during the 4th quarter. My Psychology students produce booths on topics they have chosen, and this is their final exam, while the US History students have their grades as a major part of their 4th quarter grades. The history students still need to complete 4 common assessment DBQ Essays, but that will be done within the context of the years course. We went through a revolution in education during the 1930s, and then again after WWII, and now it is time we re-evaluate and make serious changes again. – Joan Tarleton |
Submit your comment
The opinions expressed here do not reflect the opinions of the Harvard Education Publishing Group or the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Harvard Education Publishing Group is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by guest bloggers.