Not by Salaries Alone
The Equity Project, a new school in New York City, garnered front-page attention in The New York Times recently by hiring eight teachers at an annual salary of $125,000 each. This will be “a test,” the journalist asserted, of whether high salaries will attract “superb teachers” and whether superb teachers will solve the problems of failing public schools. Before this experiment begins, it’s easy to predict the answers to these questions. They are “yes” and “not on their own.”

Given teachers’ relatively low pay, it’s no surprise that the prospect of earning a high salary would attract a large pool of strong applicants. It’s worth noting, though, that the school hired individuals with substantial teaching experience. They were proven—not simply promising—educators. Were schools throughout the nation to offer such salaries, they too would draw many accomplished applicants, for even the most dedicated teachers welcome competitive pay and the status that comes with it.

However, high salaries and strong teachers will not, in themselves, transform a school. It’s not enough to carefully select teachers and then assign them to the isolated classrooms of a conventional egg-crate school. A collection of solo acts—however fine they may be—won’t guarantee that a school will succeed with all its students, particularly if those students have significant learning needs. For improving a school is both an individual and an organizational challenge. Hiring superb teachers is a start, but then those teachers must work together to ensure that the school, as an organization, works well. Together, their classes must add up to a meaningful whole, rather than simply a collection of isolated experiences. The teachers must track all students’ needs and performance across subjects and grades, advising each other about what works and offering extra support where it’s needed. They must work closely with parents and draw upon other community resources to serve their students. Only when superb individuals work in an effective organization can we expect success.

Fortunately, the Equity Project’s founder doesn’t seem naïve or short-sighted. He’s deliberately hired the teachers to work as a team. Those who have been hired express interest in collaborating with other skilled professionals. However, if the school falters or fails, let’s not conclude that high pay for teachers was a mistake, but recognize that it was just not enough.


About the Author: Susan Moore Johnson is the Pforzheimer Professor of Teaching and Learning at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

Comments:

Jun 17, 2009 02:17 PM I had much the same reaction when I read the New York Times article. No one teacher can be expert in all aspects of the curriculum, all the possible ways to teach it, and every child who sits in his or her class. But every teacher should have expertise that can be tapped by other teachers to improve their knowledge of their subject, their teaching skill, and their knowledge of their students. It is in that collaboration--done carefully and deliberately--that teachers can become great teachers.

The education world has spent a lot of time and effort on the issue of teacher quality--with good reason, because good teachers are the foundation of our education system. But good teachers are just the beginning. It is how teachers go about their work that makes a difference.

– Karin Chenoweth

Jun 17, 2009 04:15 PM Apologies, but in a bit of a rush!

My first observation would be, show me the evidence/facts. There exist to the best of my knowledge, no such facts to support the analysis.

Having recently returned from Helsinki, where I attended a seminar/discussion on this subject matter yes, there was some but, little reference made to teacher salaries being the solution-you cannot buy student achievement outcomes.

In whatever region of the world the topic of education is raised; one finds the culture of the environment to be "the fox in the henhouse".
The culture of a centrist controlled environment where information is deceminated as an exception to the rule. And regulation, structure, and or policy is passed to the school level is met with "can they make us do that, is that part of our collective bargaining" not how can we institute the changes in the best interest of students, parents, and community.

Summarily, we need to change the culture of the environment not throw dollars at the existing one with the hope something will stick- buy a new one, at what final cost.

– Ernest Price, Intermontech Inc.

Jun 17, 2009 05:57 PM Hiring great and proven teachers is certainly a start; however, as the adage goes - it takes a village to raise a child. I always share with the parents of my students that all of the stakeholders must effectively collaborate with each other in order to insure the success of the children. I don't believe that any one instructor is great in all core subjects; so there must be a collaborative effort on each teacher's part to help insure this success. Assessment is a critical issue as well. The educational leader can aid or deter the success of this effort. He/she must be as proven as the hired instructors as well. Ultimately, success for all students is a process and I believe that success is slow and deliberate. Finally, I believe that "...all that glitters is not gold."

– Portia Jones

Jun 17, 2009 08:21 PM
I agree with Ernest Price, which requires changing the culture, because what good is having a Super Teacher? unless you have a student who wants to learn most of the good things that the teacher can teach you (human and academic).

Gracias.

– Igor

Jun 18, 2009 12:09 AM My friend and mentor, Bruce Cooper of Fordham University, suggested I contact you in terms of your article entitled, Not by Salaries Alone. I am interested to learn if you have conducted research into the impact charter schools have on their host public school districts. Thank you very much. Best regards, Stephen Coffin

– Stephen Coffin

Jun 20, 2009 11:18 AM In response to your question, Stephen, I have not conducted research on the impact of charter schools on their host districts. However, I co-authored a study about how teachers experienced the work environments of charter schools. Titled, "'Sometimes Bureaucracy Has its Charms,'" it was published by Teachers College Press in February 2000. I think its findings, which highlight the importance of the school organization and culture, hold true today.

– Susan Moore Johnson

Jun 26, 2009 12:42 PM As is often the case, Susan Moore Johnson gets it right. I don't begrudge those teachers their $125,000 a year their, but as public policy the big factors attracting teachers and motivating them to perform are outside the pay envelope. The chain of evidence on this question stretches back to Willard Waller and his studies of teachers in the 1930s and extend forward to Dan Lortie and to Johnson herself. The McKinsey report in 2008 that examined high performing school systems throughout the world found that the commonality among them was a combination of high entry standards for teaching followed by generous support for students entering teaching and for professional development for novices. And what is still one of my touchstones: the 1987 Work Orientation and Job Performance: The Cultural Basis of Teaching Rewards and Incentives by Mitchell, Ortiz, and Mitchell lays out a host of potential rewards and incentives in addition to pay. Foolishly, I believe, the policy debates including the current one center solely on pay for performance.

– Charles Taylor Kerchner

Aug 14, 2009 06:32 PM For over ten years, I served a large urban school district as a traveling coach, (instructional specialist) working in directly in classrooms with teachers. I found effective teachers establish credibility early through verbal and nonverbal language. They are skilled at building a classroom with a heart that is student-to-teacher, teacher-to-student and most importantly student=to-student.

I found that content knowledge doesn't mean much if the educator can't create an environment that is both rigorous and emotionally safe.

Effective teachers exemplify resilience, determination, fairness, firmness, stamina, pesistence. These traits are part of their dna. Certainly the money justifies the killer hours they must put in to succeed.

– Lorraine Richardson

Aug 20, 2009 05:01 AM I AM PRINCIPAL OF A SCHOOL WHERE ALL TEACHERS SHOULD BE PAID $100,000 ANNUALLY!!!!!
Why all the fuss, folks. Kids jump into positions in the business world with salaries of $70-80,000 without anyone blinking an eye.
We "touch the future" "mold America" "teach the next generation"- all cliches but true! Aren't we all worth the same?

– Mary Alice Gruppi

Sep 10, 2009 11:42 AM I am a dyslexia specialist in Texas. I have also had twelve years of experience in a bario type of school in the Rio Grande Valley. I currently teach children in a mid to upper echelon and what I have learned is: kids are kids are kids. The issues are not always the same, but if you place any child in a safe nurturing environment with a good teacher; If the school or district is willing to provide great outside and inside training; and if the teachers work together as a team, you will have success. The salary would be a huge incentive. I have taught for 20 years and had lots of success with my students, but year after year I struggle to pay bills, can't afford to provide insurance for family members and have to supplement my income with a second job. Currently I tutor everyday after school and I have a retail job on the weekends. The thought of even a possibility of making $125,000 - wow! I cannot even fathom! I will be surprised if this doesn't almost guarantee success!

– Betsy Cauley

Feb 21, 2010 01:07 AM I am a Harvard trained Reading Specialist and I am that because I believe the best and the brightest should be lifting up those who need it. I work very hard and don't make a lot of money. A significant percentage goes to paying my Harvard loans! It would be great if teachers did not have to take out loans to get a Masters degree--that would be a salary increase in itself! The truth is, I'm not going to work harder because I make more money. I work hard because of the young people depending on me for their futures. I work with at-risk kids-- kids that may start their days by crying about missing their fathers who are in jail...again. However, making more money would help my own mind be at ease at night, when I'm thinking of my own life, and how I will pay the bills and be dressed decently for work.

– Tara Lee Ronzetti

Submit your comment

:
:  will not be published
:
The opinions expressed here do not reflect the opinions of the Harvard Education Publishing Group or the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Harvard Education Publishing Group is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by guest bloggers.