Recent Posts
|
|
Will the Apple iPad Transform Schools?
by Andy Zucker on March 15 |
|
|
Duncan’s Message for Year 2: Move Out of Your Comfort Zone
by Nancy Walser on March 1 |
|
|
How Gender’s Got Us All Tied Up
by Gretchen Brion-Meisels on February 8 |
|
|
Another Missed Opportunity for Reform?
by Kavitha Mediratta on January 19 |
|
|
Looking Back, Looking Forward
by Nancy Walser on January 7 |
More from Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Coming Soon: AP: A Critical Examination of the Advanced Placement Program
- New Release: What Next? Educational Innovation and Philadelphia’s School of the Future
- New Release: Teaching Talent
- New Release: Against the Odds
- Four Central Dilemmas of Struggling Schools
- Online Testing, Version 1.0
- Beyond Gay-Straight Alliances
Know What You’re Doing
by Karin Chenoweth on September 28, 2009
Great consternation has greeted Secretary Arne Duncan’s stated goal of turning around 5,000 of the country’s lowest-performing schools over the next five years.
Some of the more commonly expressed sentiments are along the lines of: “Doesn’t he know that no one really knows how to turn around such deep-rooted dysfunction?”
Recently I was talking with one of the principals whose school I profiled in It’s Being Done: Academic Success in Unexpected Schools, Barbara Adderley, about this very subject. I thought I would pass along her words: “If you know what you’re doing, you can make change.”
Simple words from someone who has been there, done that.
Barbara Adderley took one of the lowest-performing, highest poverty elementary schools in Philadelphia (and that’s saying something) in 2001 and turned it into a school that performed, for the most part, better than most other schools in Pennsylvania. She did it by knowing what she was doing.
Similarly, Deb Gustafson, the principal at Ware Elementary, which I profile in my new book, How It’s Being Done: Urgent Lessons from Unexpected Schools, arrived at Ware Elementary School in the summer of 2001, just after it was named one of the first schools in Kansas to be in need of improvement. When she walked into the building for the first time as principal, the stench of urine hit her from the filthy bathroom. “Every facet of the building was broken,” she told me. Student achievement was low and the student suspensions high. Today, the school is one of the highest achieving schools in the state.
Gustafson was able to lead the school to success because she knew what she was doing.
Gustafson and Adderley (who is now working in Washington, D.C., with Chancellor Michelle Rhee) both know that the key to school improvement was to ensure that every possible minute is used for high-quality instruction. That sounds simple, but no one should mistake simple for easy.
Educating children is a complicated task, made more complicated when children live in poverty or chaos. But Adderley, Gustafson, and many others (some of whom I have written about in my books) have demonstrated that schools serving low-income children can succeed.
Secretary Duncan’s goal of turning around 5,000 schools in five years has been called by some commentators “education’s moon shot.”
But if we learn from Adderley, Gustafson, and all the other educators who have succeeded in turning around seemingly hopeless schools, it will look more like a drive across country—occasionally grueling, but achievable with the knowledge and resources we currently have.
And, by making sure that the children in the lowest-performing 5,000 schools in the country are learning, we will move a little bit closer toward ensuring that all children in the United State become educated citizens.
Some of the more commonly expressed sentiments are along the lines of: “Doesn’t he know that no one really knows how to turn around such deep-rooted dysfunction?”
Recently I was talking with one of the principals whose school I profiled in It’s Being Done: Academic Success in Unexpected Schools, Barbara Adderley, about this very subject. I thought I would pass along her words: “If you know what you’re doing, you can make change.”
Simple words from someone who has been there, done that.
Barbara Adderley took one of the lowest-performing, highest poverty elementary schools in Philadelphia (and that’s saying something) in 2001 and turned it into a school that performed, for the most part, better than most other schools in Pennsylvania. She did it by knowing what she was doing.
Similarly, Deb Gustafson, the principal at Ware Elementary, which I profile in my new book, How It’s Being Done: Urgent Lessons from Unexpected Schools, arrived at Ware Elementary School in the summer of 2001, just after it was named one of the first schools in Kansas to be in need of improvement. When she walked into the building for the first time as principal, the stench of urine hit her from the filthy bathroom. “Every facet of the building was broken,” she told me. Student achievement was low and the student suspensions high. Today, the school is one of the highest achieving schools in the state.
Gustafson was able to lead the school to success because she knew what she was doing.
Gustafson and Adderley (who is now working in Washington, D.C., with Chancellor Michelle Rhee) both know that the key to school improvement was to ensure that every possible minute is used for high-quality instruction. That sounds simple, but no one should mistake simple for easy.
Educating children is a complicated task, made more complicated when children live in poverty or chaos. But Adderley, Gustafson, and many others (some of whom I have written about in my books) have demonstrated that schools serving low-income children can succeed.
Secretary Duncan’s goal of turning around 5,000 schools in five years has been called by some commentators “education’s moon shot.”
But if we learn from Adderley, Gustafson, and all the other educators who have succeeded in turning around seemingly hopeless schools, it will look more like a drive across country—occasionally grueling, but achievable with the knowledge and resources we currently have.
And, by making sure that the children in the lowest-performing 5,000 schools in the country are learning, we will move a little bit closer toward ensuring that all children in the United State become educated citizens.
Comments:
| Feb 5, 2010 06:59 PM |
As an educator who has spent the last 13 years as a teacher and administrator in various Title I schools, I FULLY AGREE that "it can be done." I absolutely loved your book and was especially excited to see the reform model that utilized Responsive Classroom as a social-emotional curriculum. Our school implemented this model along with a workshop approach to teaching across the curriculum and made great gains... some measurable and some not. My concern is that the current curriculum along with federal legislation/mandates such as NCLB and Race to the Top place far more emphasis on testing and way too little on teaching. While our students certainly need to be assessed (both formally and informally), it concerns me that although we know that our current assessment system is flawed, federal mandates continue to emphasize the results of these tests as a sole standard for measuring student, teacher, and school success. My fear is that such legislation will lead teachers to "teach to the test," therefore robbing students of the opportunity to be engaged in a thoughtful, responsive, authentic, and constructivist learning environment.
Respectfully, jenb – jenb |
Submit your comment
The opinions expressed here do not reflect the opinions of the Harvard Education Publishing Group or the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Harvard Education Publishing Group is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by guest bloggers.