Recent Posts
|
|
The Arts and UDL: What General Education Can Learn from the Margins
by Don Glass on April 12 |
|
|
Deeper Learning and the Common Core
by Robert Rothman on April 1 |
|
|
Universal Design for Learning and Improving Education for Incarcerated Youth
by Joanne Karger on March 20 |
|
|
The Power of Parents
by Michael Sadowski on March 4 |
|
|
Stand Up or Bystand? New Insights on Bullying
by Silvia Diazgranados Ferráns and Robert L. Selman on February 11 |
More from Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Nine Ways the Common Core Will Change Classroom Practice
- The Poverty Gap
- Teachers Writing It Their Way
It all began with a trip to the cinema to see Cameron Diaz in her new comedy, Bad Teacher. It was a bad choice, really. But what can I say? My editor was curious.
Not a great flick, but as a parody of bad employees, in terms of things that can get you fired—drugs, alcohol, cheating, foul language, inappropriate sexual behavior—Ms. Diaz slams pedal to the metal. You’ve probably heard: she nips out of the airline booze bottles hidden in her desk, smokes a bong in the parking lot, hands her bra to a seriously uncool kid to improve his street cred, and steals the answers to state tests.
Firing offenses? Sure, but “bad” teacher? Hmmm. Not quite. A bad teacher is different than a lousy role model. A bad teacher is someone who fails to teach, someone more like say, the teacher I had in third grade who lazed through an entire year with mimeographed worksheets and spelling tests, ignoring with equal disinterest those breezing through the too-easy work and those staring in despair at the sheets of problems.
She would stand dazed with boredom before the rows of desks, licking a finger to count out worksheets, then teeter back to her desk, kick off her heels, and pop a mint into her mouth. Those who finished early were invited to come rub her thick neck and shoulders while she noisily sucked the candy and stared out the window anywhere but at the kids sitting in abject, shame-filled misery before her.
Now that’s a bad teacher.
Anyway, thinking about this and other teacher movies I’ve seen, I began to wonder about Hollywood’s portrayal of teachers: were they quirky or idealized, sentimental or critical? And how did Tinsel Town depict “good” teachers?
So I turned to Netflix. A cursory review of the teacher film canon interestingly showed, that nearly all were biopics—To Sir with Love, Freedom Writers, Goodbye Mr. Chips, Dangerous Minds, Conrack, Mr. Holland’s Opus, Friday Night Lights, Lean on Me, The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie, Up the Down Staircase, Take the Lead, Dead Poets Society, Music of the Heart, Stand and Deliver (to name some)—all based on memoirs by educators or novels about teachers written by students.
The second thing I discovered is that, with the exception of a few, most were urban classroom-turnaround tales. The reason for this seems obvious: there is more heart-warming—and self-serving—drama in saving urban youth. These films also feed on a collective-anxiety-type drama by subjecting a fresh-faced young teacher to public humiliation at the hands of unruly teens of color. The remarkably racist trailer, for instance, for Up the Down Staircase begins with Sandra Dennis walking through crowds of African American and Latino students in Spanish Harlem as a voiceover intones: “What’s a nice girl doing in a crazy place like this?”
These fairytale stories are not unlike the depiction of student-teacher relations in another relatively recent movie, Where the Wild Things Are, Maurice Sendak’s tale of how of how a boy, Max, deconstructs evil; teacher hero disarms classroom monsters by unearthing their terrible pain, and then tames them with love and support. Earning the monsters’ respect (Max is made king!) allows the teacher to work magic in transforming raging beasts into lovable critters.
These teacher movies unspool in similar and predictable formats. They begin with the teacher’s back story of disappointment—divorce, career change, lack of opportunity— which leads to a last-minute hire into a job no one wants. The school’s principal and colleagues tell the rookie not to expect much, suggest dumbing-down texts, and warn the newbie to “watch out:” the kids are merciless.
Sure enough the class makes short work of the greenhorn who, after contemplating desertion, brainstorms how to win them over: trying unorthodox methods like games, dangerous visits to the ghetto to call on parents, bribes of candy, playing Beethoven (Conrack), or life-changing field trips against school rules to the white side of town, which entails fancy restaurants, trick-or-treating (Conrack again), amusement parks, and museums.
There are bumps along the way, but the kids are inevitably won over and, in the end, return the love. (Lulu sings an iconic tribute in To Sir with Love about how Sidney Poitier’s character brought an uncouth class of East Enders “from crayons to perfume” by demanding they show more self-respect.) In the end, the teachers discover great fulfillment in doing work that “changes lives.”
As to how well Hollywood’s depiction of “great” teachers squares with the real world, I did some fact checking to learn (no surprise here) that the demands of a compelling story arc trump the truth about the actual success these educators had in raising student achievement.
Read the rest of Colleen's online exclusive from the Harvard Education Letter.
Not a great flick, but as a parody of bad employees, in terms of things that can get you fired—drugs, alcohol, cheating, foul language, inappropriate sexual behavior—Ms. Diaz slams pedal to the metal. You’ve probably heard: she nips out of the airline booze bottles hidden in her desk, smokes a bong in the parking lot, hands her bra to a seriously uncool kid to improve his street cred, and steals the answers to state tests.
Firing offenses? Sure, but “bad” teacher? Hmmm. Not quite. A bad teacher is different than a lousy role model. A bad teacher is someone who fails to teach, someone more like say, the teacher I had in third grade who lazed through an entire year with mimeographed worksheets and spelling tests, ignoring with equal disinterest those breezing through the too-easy work and those staring in despair at the sheets of problems.
She would stand dazed with boredom before the rows of desks, licking a finger to count out worksheets, then teeter back to her desk, kick off her heels, and pop a mint into her mouth. Those who finished early were invited to come rub her thick neck and shoulders while she noisily sucked the candy and stared out the window anywhere but at the kids sitting in abject, shame-filled misery before her.
Now that’s a bad teacher.
Anyway, thinking about this and other teacher movies I’ve seen, I began to wonder about Hollywood’s portrayal of teachers: were they quirky or idealized, sentimental or critical? And how did Tinsel Town depict “good” teachers?
So I turned to Netflix. A cursory review of the teacher film canon interestingly showed, that nearly all were biopics—To Sir with Love, Freedom Writers, Goodbye Mr. Chips, Dangerous Minds, Conrack, Mr. Holland’s Opus, Friday Night Lights, Lean on Me, The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie, Up the Down Staircase, Take the Lead, Dead Poets Society, Music of the Heart, Stand and Deliver (to name some)—all based on memoirs by educators or novels about teachers written by students.
The second thing I discovered is that, with the exception of a few, most were urban classroom-turnaround tales. The reason for this seems obvious: there is more heart-warming—and self-serving—drama in saving urban youth. These films also feed on a collective-anxiety-type drama by subjecting a fresh-faced young teacher to public humiliation at the hands of unruly teens of color. The remarkably racist trailer, for instance, for Up the Down Staircase begins with Sandra Dennis walking through crowds of African American and Latino students in Spanish Harlem as a voiceover intones: “What’s a nice girl doing in a crazy place like this?”
These fairytale stories are not unlike the depiction of student-teacher relations in another relatively recent movie, Where the Wild Things Are, Maurice Sendak’s tale of how of how a boy, Max, deconstructs evil; teacher hero disarms classroom monsters by unearthing their terrible pain, and then tames them with love and support. Earning the monsters’ respect (Max is made king!) allows the teacher to work magic in transforming raging beasts into lovable critters.
These teacher movies unspool in similar and predictable formats. They begin with the teacher’s back story of disappointment—divorce, career change, lack of opportunity— which leads to a last-minute hire into a job no one wants. The school’s principal and colleagues tell the rookie not to expect much, suggest dumbing-down texts, and warn the newbie to “watch out:” the kids are merciless.
Sure enough the class makes short work of the greenhorn who, after contemplating desertion, brainstorms how to win them over: trying unorthodox methods like games, dangerous visits to the ghetto to call on parents, bribes of candy, playing Beethoven (Conrack), or life-changing field trips against school rules to the white side of town, which entails fancy restaurants, trick-or-treating (Conrack again), amusement parks, and museums.
There are bumps along the way, but the kids are inevitably won over and, in the end, return the love. (Lulu sings an iconic tribute in To Sir with Love about how Sidney Poitier’s character brought an uncouth class of East Enders “from crayons to perfume” by demanding they show more self-respect.) In the end, the teachers discover great fulfillment in doing work that “changes lives.”
As to how well Hollywood’s depiction of “great” teachers squares with the real world, I did some fact checking to learn (no surprise here) that the demands of a compelling story arc trump the truth about the actual success these educators had in raising student achievement.
Read the rest of Colleen's online exclusive from the Harvard Education Letter.
Comments:
| Sep 1, 2011 11:31 AM |
Now how is this? I did not know that there was any other teacher,in the world, except Mrs. Alan, my third grade teacher (in Johannesburg, more than 50 years ago) who rewarded fast work and good behavior with a chance to massage her neck (we also got to massage her stockinged feet!). And, what is more, she also had mints that she sucked as she reclined on her cushioned chair. Is this a type?
– Elbie Henning |
| Sep 1, 2011 06:40 PM |
I have written about this in a piece I call the "Public Take on Teaching" making the point that somehow society can't say "Good-bye to Mr Chips". Your article is excellent and the successful teacher you describe is the model of where the profession has moved. Teachers are not social workers they cannot "fix kids" but they can "fix their practice" through deep knowledge and work. This unfortunatley won't sell at the box office.
– Sue Beveridge |
| Sep 5, 2011 01:15 PM |
Although I agree that Hollywood thrives on conflict (ask any doctor/lawyer/detective about their real day), I am still waiting for the definitive teacher movie.
– Jan Seiter |
| Sep 16, 2011 12:19 AM |
The myth of transformation is toxic. It leads teachers to cultivate charisma instead of attend to students, it drives students to tell us what we want to hear, and it allows fellow citizens to turn a deaf ear to cries from high-poverty schools. After all, the right teacher can just learn to care, whip up some magic, and fix the whole thing with just chalk and spit.
Add Pygmalion and My Fair Lady to your list, then read Metamorphosis Hurts: Resistant Students and Myths of Transformation by Bronwyn T. Williams. As for seriously great films about education, try The Unvanquished (or Aparajito) by director Satyajit Ray, and Avoir/Etre from Nicolas Philibert. – aimee |
| Sep 19, 2011 10:20 PM |
You seem to object to Music of the Heart because it's the story of inner city kids "saved." But really, it's the story of an inspiring teacher in a dramatic background. Movies tend to be in dramatic circumstances, or they are boring.
I just saw a beautiful documentary of Jascha Heifetz called "God's Fiddler." by Peter Rosen. He was the best violinist in his day (1901-1960). He was a good teacher, even inspiring his students because of his incredible skill, but not a great one because he couldn't establish rapport well -- his personality was too difficult. If you watch videos of Itchak Perlman teaching, you see that he also inspires, but because he is a warm and friendly person, the students like him and he helps them more effectively. These films are not riveting cinema, but they do show good, and great teachers at work, and they aren't saving an minorities. However, I don't think transformation is a myth. Great teachers are transformative. They are just RARE. – Dov Kruger |
| Nov 2, 2011 11:02 AM |
BLACKBOARD JUNGLE needs to be added to your list.
– Pat Riley |
| Nov 17, 2011 09:35 AM |
I enjoyed your article. In thinking about film as a genre that inspires educators and learners alike, I grow anxious and excited about myre-viewing the film entitled "Swing Kids." Our seniors will be conducting research for their senior project. My "senior citizen project" will focus on dangers for teens in Nazi occupied Europe who listened to swing music. Thanks!
– Mary Walker |
| Nov 20, 2011 10:26 PM |
"To Be and to Have" is an amazing film that portrays great teaching that does not fit into any Hollywood template. It's a documentary about a one-room schoolhouse in France. It shows what great teaching can be.
It does not apply to our current US system because it is so far from the sensitive, student-centered teaching that is shown in the film. It also takes place in a tiny school with a single small class with children from age five to about age 15. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0318202/ – Phil Cantor |
| Nov 21, 2011 07:15 AM |
I taught 8th grade for nearly 20 years. I never met a bad child. I met mostly neglected children. Too many did not have an adult who took an interest in them, as I saw it. I agree about the bad teacher described here. The ones who just write something on the board and expect the kids to figure it out are the bad teachers. That movie is just pure Hollywood nonsense. Teaching and learning happens when good teachers have a well planned out day of activities that literally force the students to think and think and think. Then, make them write and write and write. "You really can't teach anyone anything. You can only bring them to find it within themselves." ~Socrates. It is done by being very demanding and insisting that they practice, practice, practice. If you are persistent, the students will love you for it. If you just pretend to teach, the students will resent you eventually.
– Joey |
| Jan 12, 2012 03:59 PM |
Please add to the list, "Beyond the Blackboard, the Stacey Bess Story". It is truly a movie about a good teacher.
– Jolene Reinhart |
| Jan 21, 2012 11:14 AM |
I like your article. There is truth behind it.
Good teachers are everywhere. However, the way a person describes a good teacher varies. We come from different walks of life and we have different perspectives. One can say that that teacher is bad and another one will say that the teacher is good. The bottom line is, the way we describe a good and bad teacher depends on the way we define good and bad. – Kenny Bayudan |
Submit your comment
The opinions expressed here do not reflect the opinions of the Harvard Education Publishing Group or the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Harvard Education Publishing Group is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by guest bloggers.

