Harvard Education Press »
Harvard Education Letter »
HER
|
About HER
|
Contact Us
Current Issue
Past Issues
Book Notes
Coming Soon
Subscriptions
Permissions
Subscriptions
Subscribers-Only Website
Submissions
Guidelines for Authors
The
Harvard Educational Review
(
HER
) accepts contributions from researchers, scholars, policy makers, practitioners, teachers, students, and informed observers in education and related fields. In addition to original reports of research and theory,
HER
welcomes articles that reflect on teaching and practice in educational settings in the United States and abroad.
HER
has a two-stage review process. In the first stage, all manuscripts that are submitted go through an initial screening process and are read by a minimum of two Editorial Board members. During the second stage, manuscripts are considered by the full Editorial Board and receive written feedback based on the Board’s discussion.
It is the policy of
HER
to consider for publication only manuscripts that are not simultaneously being considered elsewhere. Similarly, it is journal policy not to publish manuscripts that are currently available online or in print. To this end,
HER
requires that authors remove manuscripts from publicly available Web sites before submission.
Please follow the following guidelines in preparing a manuscript for submission.
Types of Articles
Research Articles
Manuscripts reporting original research related to education should include: background and context and/or theoretical/conceptual framework, literature review, methods, findings and analysis, and discussion sections. The literature review should be relevant to the research topic and findings. All methodologies need to be clearly described and should match the research questions or stated purpose of the manuscript. The findings should be clear, and the arguments set forth should emerge from the analysis of the data presented in the manuscript. Accepted manuscripts typically include clear implications of the research and are accessible to
HER
’s generalist readership.
Essays
An essay should have a well-developed argument that answers a particular question or several related questions. This argument may engage with previous work and may take on a subjective point of view. Essays should include reasoning, evidence, and examples to support the author’s thesis. They may also take other forms, including expository or narrative manuscripts.
Voices: Reflective Accounts of Education (formerly Inside Schools
)
The
Harvard Educational Review
recognizes the value of experiential knowledge and is committed to featuring the voices of people engaged in various educational activities around the world. We welcome reflective pieces written by students, teachers, parents, community members, and others involved in education whose perspectives can inform policy, practice, and/or research. The power of Voices: Reflective Accounts of Education articles rests primarily in the voice of the author(s) and its rich grounding in practice, which may be informed by theory and research. Submissions generally contain a detailed narrative that weaves together ideas, situations, and experiences and highlights key learnings.
Additional Submissions
HER
welcomes submissions in addition to the above categories. If your manuscript does not correspond to any of the above categories, please select this option. On submission, you will be asked to provide a statement of up to 100 words that describes the nature of your manuscript.
Criteria
Significance and Impact
Manuscripts should focus on questions relevant to the field of education. These questions should be pointed and should also have implications for broader educational problems, nationally and/or globally. Manuscripts should contribute to the work of stakeholders seeking to address educational challenges and should explicitly state their contributions, whether theoretical or practical, in order to identify the populations that would most benefit from its publication, such as teachers, policy makers, or students.
Advancement of the Field
The manuscript should push existing theory in a new direction and/or extend, fill a gap in, or bring a new perspective to current literature.
Clarity and Style
Manuscripts must be well written in clear, concise language and be free of technical jargon. As a generalist journal,
HER
strives for all articles to be widely accessible to nonexperts. Previously published
HER
articles can serve as examples of the style of writing appropriate for the audience. The editors understand that the specific organization of a manuscript may differ according to discipline and the author’s aesthetic.
Submission Guidelines
Authors should indicate whether they are submitting their manuscript as a research article, an essay, a feature, a Voices: Reflective Accounts of Education article, an essay review, or a book review.
Formatting
HER
accepts manuscripts of up to
9,000 words
, including abstract, appendixes, and references, and reserves the right to return any manuscript that exceeds that length.
All text must be double-spaced. Type size must be at least 12 point with 1-inch margins on all sides, and paper size should be set to 8.5 x 11, even if printed on A4 paper.
Authors should refer to
The Chicago Manual of Style
(CMS) for general questions of style, grammar, punctuation, usage, and form.
The journal defers to author preference in decisions about the naming and capitalization of racial, ethnic, and cultural groups. Manuscripts should be internally consistent in this regard. For all nonlegal manuscripts, authors should use the
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
for reference and citation formats.
References must be in APA format
.
The Uniform System of Citation
, published by the
Harvard Law Review
, should be used for articles that reply heavily on legal documentation; because this form is not easily adaptable to other sources, it is usually combined with
CMS
as necessary. Manuscripts with references and/or citations in another form will be returned to the author(s).
Keywords
Immediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of six keywords, based on the ERIC list of index descriptors (see
http://www.eric.ed.gov/
). Authors may choose to include one or two “free” keywords not included on the ERIC list of descriptors if they wish to do so. These keywords will be used for indexing and to improve searchability.
Submission Procedure
The
Harvard Educational Review
uses an electronic submission process. To submit a manuscript for consideration,
please visit
https://hepg.submittable.com/submit
and follow the specific instructions for your intended manuscript type.
Manuscripts are considered anonymously.
The author’s name must not appear anywhere in the manuscript
; any references that identify the author in the text must be either deleted or made anonymous (e.g., instead of citing “Smith, 1972,” cite “Author, 1972”). Please do not submit a title page as part of your manuscript.
Contacting the
Harvard Educational Review
:
For questions about submitting a manuscript, please contact Laura Clos at
laura_clos@gse.harvard.edu
.
Editors can also be reached at:
Harvard Educational Review
8 Story Street, First Floor
Cambridge, MA 02138
Voices in
Education Blog
Knowledge Citizens? Intellectual Disability and the Production of Social Meanings Within Educational Research
by
Ashley Taylor
Comprehension Is Collaborative—and Why That Matters for Emergent Bilingual Students
by
Maren Aukerman and Lorien Chambers Schuldt
Growing Bigger Selves for Social Justice
by
Eleanor Drago-Severson and Jessica Blum-DeStefano
Charlottesville, Unalienable Rights, and Justice for All
by
Chezare A. Warren
The Role of Literature in our Age of Global Conflict
by
Suzanne S. Choo
More Voices in Education »
Subscribe via RSS »
Sign up for our eNewsletter »
More from
Harvard Education Publishing Group
Harvard Education Press
Youth, Education, and the Role of Society
Anytime, Anywhere
Leading Instructional Rounds in Education
School Libraries and Student Learning
Harvard Education Letter
Nine Ways the Common Core Will Change Classroom Practice
Lessons from the Data Wise Project
7 Myths About Cage-Busting Leadership